Worked scenario
Example: a planned finish on 10 October and actual finish on 15 October has a five-calendar-day variance; attribution needs separate analysis.
Free schedule delay analysis tool for construction projects. Compare planned vs. actual dates, flag critical activities, and log delay causes and impacts.
| No. | Activity / Task | WBS / Zone | Critical | Baseline Start | Baseline Finish | Actual / Forecast Finish | Delay Status | % Complete | Status | Delay Cause | Remarks |
|---|
| No. | Delay / Event Description | Related Activity | Category | Days Impact | Critical Path | Responsibility | Status | Remarks | Scan |
|---|
Free schedule delay analysis tool for construction projects. Compare planned vs. actual dates, flag critical activities, and log delay causes and impacts.
Use the dates, quantities and currency shown in the workspace. Keep one currency and a consistent reporting cut-off.
Compare activity planned and actual dates and record delay events. A variance log does not establish critical-path causation or contractual entitlement.
Method: the owner’s supplied worksheet and the arithmetic described above.
Illustrative inputs for checking the method; these are not project records.
Example: a planned finish on 10 October and actual finish on 15 October has a five-calendar-day variance; attribution needs separate analysis.
Free schedule delay analysis tool for construction projects. Compare planned vs. actual dates, flag critical activities, and log delay causes and impacts.
Use the dates, quantities and currency shown in the workspace. Keep one currency and a consistent reporting cut-off. Compare activity planned and actual dates and record delay events. A variance log does not establish critical-path causation or contractual entitlement.
Use the save, export and print controls shown in this workspace. Where CSV export is available, the exported data can be opened in a spreadsheet. Browser print can save a PDF.