Project
Design traffic (Chapter 2)
Design life, growth and design lane
| Growth period | Years | Growth rate (% a year) |
|---|
How do you want to describe the heavy traffic?
One row per vehicle type and load state (laden and empty as two rows). Enter the daily number in each direction in the count year and the load on each axle group. Vehicles with an unladen weight under 3,000 kg are ignored (Section 2.1). The vehicle types follow Table 2-1; new rows start at the Table 2-4 standard load of each group (Pakistan types at the NHA legal limits).
| # | Vehicle (Table 2-1) & description | Dir. 1 per day | Dir. 2 per day | Axle groups & loads | ESA / vehicle | ESA / day dir. 1 | ESA / day dir. 2 |
|---|
Axle group codes and standard loads (Tables 2-2 and 2-4)
| Code | Axle group | Axles | Table 2-4 standard load = 1 ESA |
|---|
Equation 2-5: EF = (P / SA)n. With each axle separately the group load is shared equally by its axles and each axle is compared with 80 kN (8,160 kg); with each axle group the whole group is compared with its Table 2-4 load. RN31 recommends the Table 2-4 standard axles where more than 25% of the trucks run on super-single (wide-base) tyres (Key point 6). The equation applies up to 13 t per axle (Section 2.3.2).
ESA per day in the count year from an axle load survey analysis (e.g. TRL Overseas Road Note 40 or the RN31 spreadsheet), for each direction.
Damage exponent n (Table 2-3)
Subgrade (Chapter 3)
Presumptive CBR values when there is no test data (Table 3-5)
| Material | USCS | Excellent to good drainage | Fair to poor drainage |
|---|
Expansive (reactive) subgrade
Foundation class and capping (Section 8.2, Keys 2 & 3)
The catalogues are built on four foundation classes. Subgrades S3 to S6 are foundation classes F1 to F4 as they are; S1 and S2 must be capped to at least F1, and any subgrade can be capped to a higher class to thin the upper layers. Every route below is used in the comparison in Step 4.
Pavement structures from the catalogues (Chapter 9)
Costs (your rates, in place)
| Code | Material | Rate | Unit |
|---|
Leave a rate blank if you don’t know it: options are then ranked by total thickness instead of cost.
Life-cycle cost (Chapter 12)
Options for this traffic and subgrade
Design philosophy of the charts (Road Note 31)
Selected design
Changing a layer material (Section 8.6, Equation 8-1)
Where one material is scarce and another plentiful (for example sub-base material scarce but roadbase material plentiful), a catalogue layer can be replaced by a thinner layer of a stronger material: hc = h2 × a2 / a1, with the layer coefficients of Table 11-2. The new material must still meet the specification of the layer it replaces.
Method, assumptions & references
- Design traffic. Equivalence factor EF = (P/SA)n (Equation 2-5) with the Table 2-3 exponent; ESA per day in each direction from the daily counts × seasonal factor F × mean EF per vehicle; the design-lane loading from Table 2-5; cumulative ESA by Equation 2-6, summed year by year when there are several growth periods. Traffic class from Key 1 (T1 < 0.3 … T10 50–80 MESA; T10 designs are long-life and used for all higher traffic). A value on a class boundary goes to the higher class.
- Exponent per chart. Table 2-3 gives n by roadbase/sub-base: granular/granular 4 (Charts A1, B, C1, F), granular/cemented 3 (Charts A2, C2, D), cemented/cemented 4.5 (used here for Chart A3, whose cemented roadbase sits on a granular or hydraulically-modified sub-base; Table 2-3 has no cemented/granular row), bituminous/granular and bituminous/cemented 4. Choose one value for every chart to override.
- Subgrade. Design CBR = lower 10th percentile of the soaked CBR results of a uniform section (5th percentile for trunk roads), PERCENTILE.INC method; at least 10 results; coefficient of variation below 30% (Section 3.3.6). Subgrade class from Table 3-9. Cover over reactive subgrades from Table 3-8.
- Foundation. Foundation classes F1–F4 (Key 2, Table 8-1) and the capping options of Key 3. Foundation class F5 is a performance design proved by trials and is not covered. Performance foundation designs (Section 8.2.3) are checked on site with FWD/LWD surface modulus.
- Structures. Thicknesses are read from the Chapter 9 catalogues (Charts A1, A2, A3, B, C1, C2, D for main roads; Chart F for low volume roads below 3 MESA, by LVR1/LVR2 and effective subgrade class). Chart cells are reproduced as printed; only the layer substitutions stated in the chart notes (40 mm AC/HRA for DBST, GS1 for GS2, triple surface treatment) are offered. Chart E (structural numbers) and rigid pavements (Chapter 10) are not included.
- Costs. Quantity per km = thickness × carriageway width × 1,000 m (surface treatments in m²). Construction cost only, at your rates. RN31 Chapter 12 describes whole-of-life economic comparison.
- Reference: Road Note 31, A guide to the structural design of surfaced roads in tropical and sub-tropical regions, 5th edition, TRL, 2023 (FCDO / ReCAP). Always read the notes of the chart you use, and check the design against your road agency’s requirements.